OUR
EXPERIENCE
We invite you to familiarize yourself with examples of cases from the practice of the Law Office of Denis Pysanyi. We have provided our clients with qualified legal assistance and received solutions that met the interests of our clients and solved their problems. This section is a reflection of our professionalism, efficiency and business reputation.
Learn more about our experience.
TAX DISPUTES
On April 17, 2025, the KYIV DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COURT ruled in favor of our client, LLC "GENBUDPIDRYAD", declared unlawful and canceled the Decision of the State Tax Service in Kyiv on not taking into account the Table of Value Added Tax Payer Data, issued by the Chairman of the Commission on the Suspension of Registration of the Tax Invoice of the Adjustment Calculation in the Unified Register of Tax Invoices, and obliged the State Tax Service in Kyiv to take into account the Table of Value Added Tax Payer Data.
АДМІНІСТРАТИВНІ СПРАВИ
On September 17, 2025, the Kyiv District Administrative Court in case No. 320/13207/24 partially satisfied our claim to the Higher Qualification Commission of Notaries under the Ministry of Justice and declared its inaction unlawful in relation to the failure to issue our client a certificate of the right to engage in notarial activities by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine based on the results of electronic anonymous testing carried out during the qualification exam for the right to engage in notarial activities at the Higher Qualification Commission of Notaries under the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine and obliged the Higher Qualification Commission of Notaries to make a decision in accordance with paragraphs 41-42 of the Procedure for Admission of Persons to Pass the Qualification Exam and Conduct the Qualification Exam of the Higher Qualification Commission of Notaries, approved by order of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine dated 07/28/2011 No. 1905/5, registered with the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine 07/28/2011 No. 926/19664, as amended on 04/21/2023 regarding our client.
КРИМІНАЛЬНІ СПРАВИ
On July 23, 2025, the Podilskyi District Court of Kyiv released our client from criminal liability, accused of committing a criminal offense under Part 1 of Article 368 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (in the version of the Law that was in force at the time of the commission of the criminal offense) due to the expiration of the statute of limitations.
TAX DISPUTES
On April 17, 2025, the KYIV DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COURT ruled in favor of our client, LLC "GENBUDPIDRYAD", declared unlawful and canceled the Decision of the State Tax Service in Kyiv on not taking into account the Table of Value Added Tax Payer Data, issued by the Chairman of the Commission on the Suspension of Registration of the Tax Invoice of the Adjustment Calculation in the Unified Register of Tax Invoices, and obliged the State Tax Service in Kyiv to take into account the Table of Value Added Tax Payer Data.
TAX DISPUTES
On March 31, 2025, the Kyiv District Administrative Court issued a decision in case No. 320/14349/23, which fully satisfied the claim of Wavemaker LLC against the Main Directorate of the State Tax Service in Kyiv.
The essence of the dispute was an appeal against a tax notice-decision issued on the basis of an in-office inspection, in which the State Tax Service assessed a fine for allegedly untimely registration of tax invoices.
During the formation of the defense strategy and consideration of the case, the bureau's lawyers proved that the tax authority applied the unlawful provisions of the Tax Code of Ukraine, ignoring the temporary provisions in force during martial law, which provide for different deadlines for registering tax invoices and reduced penalties. The court agreed with our arguments and recognized the tax notice-decision as unlawful and subject to cancellation.
TAX DISPUTES
On March 20, 2025, the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal overturned the decision of the Kyiv District Administrative Court of July 10, 2024 and fully satisfied the claims of MEDIACOM Ukraine LLC against the Main Department of the State Tax Service in Kyiv.
The court declared unlawful and annulled the tax notices-decisions, by which the tax liabilities for value added tax on goods produced in Ukraine were unreasonably increased by UAH 4,040,288.00, and the tax liabilities for corporate income tax were increased by UAH 3,092,845.00.
CRIMINAL CASES
Recently, our team successfully defended a client in a case under Article 286, Part 1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, concerning a violation of road safety rules that caused the victim moderate bodily injuries.
At the first stage, the case seemed quite complicated due to the presence of the victim's testimony and additional circumstances that influenced the perception of the events. However, thanks to the coordinated work of the team of lawyers, careful collection and analysis of evidence, we were able to provide an effective defense strategy.
The first step was to study all the case materials: accident reports, eyewitness accounts, and video footage from the scene.
In addition to analyzing the testimony of the injured party, we found witnesses to the accident who confirmed important aspects of the event from the other side, namely that the injured person was crossing the crosswalk at a prohibited traffic light signal.
Their testimonies, as well as video recordings from the scene, played a significant role in forming an alternative version of events. Also, the examination did not confirm that the victim had moderate injuries.
Based on the collected data, a detailed legal position was prepared, which allowed us to question the accusations and offer an alternative view of the event.
The criminal proceedings were closed due to the lack of evidence of a crime, and the car seized by the investigator after the accident was returned to our client.
ПОДАТКОВІ СПОРИ
On October 17, 2024, the KYIV DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COURT ruled in favor of our client LLC "STARLIGHT BRAND CONTENT", declared unlawful and canceled the Decision of the State Tax Service Headquarters in Kyiv on not taking into account the Table of Value Added Tax Payer Data, issued by the Chairman of the Commission on the Suspension of Registration of the Tax Invoice of the Adjustment Calculation in the Unified Register of Tax Invoices, and obliged the State Tax Service Headquarters in Kyiv to take into account the Table of Value Added Tax Payer Data.
MATTERS ARISING FROM PUBLIC SERVICE RELATIONS
On April 30, 2024, the SIXTH APPEAL ADMINISTRATIVE COURT, having considered our appeal against the decision of the Kyiv District Administrative Court in the case of our client's administrative claim to the Central Interregional Department of the Ministry of Justice (Kyiv) on the recovery of average earnings for the period of forced absenteeism, canceled the aforementioned decision and adopted a new decision on the recovery from the Central Interregional Department of the Ministry of Justice in favor of our client of average earnings for the period of forced absenteeism in the amount of UAH 269,392 50 kopecks.
TAX DISPUTES
On April 15, 2024, the Supreme Court, consisting of a panel of judges of the Cassation Administrative Court, refused the Main Directorate of the State Tax Service in Kyiv to initiate cassation proceedings on a complaint against the decision of the Kyiv District Administrative Court of November 20, 2023 and the resolution of the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal of March 11, 2024 in case No. 320/14738/23, which declared unlawful and canceled the decision made by the commission of the Main Directorate of the State Tax Service in Kyiv to refuse to register tax invoices and obliged the State Tax Service of Ukraine to register in the Unified Register of Tax Invoices the tax invoices submitted by our client - LLC "Starlight Brand Content".
Therefore, the decision of the Kyiv District Administrative Court of November 20, 2023 to satisfy the claim in favor of our client is left unchanged.
TAX DISPUTES
On March 11, 2024, the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal, having considered the appeal of the Main Directorate of the State Tax Service in the city of Kyiv against the decision of the Kyiv District Administrative Court dated November 20, 2023 in the case of our client's administrative claim to the Main Directorate of the State Tax Service in the city of Kyiv, dismissed the Appeal of the Main Directorate of the State Tax Service in the city of Kyiv, and also left unchanged the decision of the Kyiv District Administrative Court, which fully satisfied the claim prepared by us in the interests of our client to the Main Directorate of the State Tax Service in the city of Kyiv and the State Tax Service of the Republic of Ukraine, recognized as unlawful and canceled the decision of the Commission of the Main Directorate of the State Tax Service in the city of Kyiv on the suspension of registration of tax invoices/calculations of adjustments in the Unified Register of Tax Invoices on the refusal to register our client's tax invoices and obliged the State Tax Service of Ukraine to register these tax invoices in the register of tax invoices.
CRIMINAL CASES
On February 27, 2024, the investigating judge of the Shevchenkivskyi District Court of Kyiv, having considered the petition of the investigator of the State Criminal Investigation Department of the State Security Service to extend the term of the preventive measure in the form of detention without the alternative of posting bail for our client, suspected of committing criminal offenses provided for in Part 1 of Article 114-1, Part 3 of Article 332, Part 3 of Article 15, Part 1 of Article 114-1, Part 3 of Article 15, Part 3 of Article 332 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, took into account the objections, evidence and arguments of lawyer Pysany Denis and extended the preventive measure in the form of detention, but determined the alternative - the amount of bail sufficient to ensure the suspect's performance of duties. The client was released from custody in connection with the posting of bail.
We do not leave a reference to the decision due to the requirements of the legal aid agreement.
PROPERTY RIGHTS DISPUTES
On February 27, 2024, the Kyiv Court of Appeal considered the plaintiff's appeal with a request to cancel the decision of the Podilskyi District Court of Kyiv, which refused to satisfy her claim against our client to recognize the property as joint joint ownership, recognize the right of ownership to a part of the apartment, and recognize the apartment purchase and sale agreement as invalid. The court took into account our arguments and evidence, left the appeal without satisfaction, and the decision of the first instance unchanged.
КРИМІНАЛЬНІ СПРАВИ
On February 27, 2024, the investigating judge of the Boryspil City District Court of Kyiv region, having considered the investigator's motion to apply a preventive measure in the form of house arrest on suspicion of our client in committing criminal offenses provided for in Part 4 of Art. 190, Part 4 of Art. 190, Part 3 of Art. 28, Part 4 of Art. 358, Part 3 of Art. 28, Part 4 of Art. 358, Part 3 of Art. 209 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, took into account the objections, evidence and arguments of lawyer Pysany Denis and applied a preventive measure in the form of a personal obligation to our client.
We do not leave a reference to the decision due to the requirements of the legal aid agreement.
CREDIT DISPUTES
On February 8, 2024, the Ovidiopol District Court of Odessa Region, having considered the bank's claim against our client to collect debt under a credit agreement from our client, the application we submitted for the statute of limitations to run and the response to the claim, concluded that the bank had applied to the court for a missed statute of limitations and refused to satisfy the claim.
CRIMINAL CASES
On January 19, 2024, the investigating judge of the Shevchenkivskyi District Court of Kyiv, having considered in an open court session in Kyiv the petition of the investigator of the Main Investigation Department of the Security Service of Ukraine to remove from her position our client, who is a suspect in criminal proceedings for committing criminal offenses provided for in Part 2 of Article 28, Part 1 of Article 114-1, Part 2 of Article 28, Part 3 of Article 332 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, took into account our arguments and refused to grant the investigator's petition to remove the client from her position.
We do not leave a reference to the court decision due to the terms of the legal aid agreement.
CRIMINAL CASES
On November 27, 2023, the investigating judge of the Shevchenkivskyi District Court of Kyiv, taking into account the objections of lawyer Pysany Denys and the evidence provided by him, partially satisfied the petition of the investigator of the 4th Department of Internal Affairs of the 1st Pre-Trial Investigation Department of the General Directorate of the Security Service of Ukraine to extend the preventive measure in the form of detention for our client, suspected of committing criminal offenses under Part 2 of Article 28, Part 1 of Article 114-1, Part 2 of Article 28, Part 3 of Article 332 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, who was previously in custody without the alternative of posting bail, and extended the preventive measure in the form of detention, but determined the alternative - the amount of bail sufficient to ensure the suspect's performance of duties. The investigator did not agree with this position and filed an appeal. On December 26, 2023, the Kyiv Court of Appeal, taking into account the objections of our lawyer, refused the investigator and upheld the decision of the court of first instance.
We do not leave a reference to the decision due to the requirements of the legal aid agreement.
CRIMINAL CASES
On October 30, 2023, the investigating judge of the Svyatoshynsky District Court of Kyiv granted the petition of lawyer Pysany Denis in the interests of our client and canceled the arrest of the land plot in criminal proceedings, which contained a ban on making any changes to the State Register of Real Rights to Real Estate (regarding other real rights and encumbrances) regarding the land plot, as well as a ban on the owners of the land plot to resolve any issues regarding the division of such land plots, the conclusion of any agreements regarding such land plots, as well as the conduct of any preparatory and/or construction work.
We do not post a link to the court decision due to the terms of the legal aid agreement.
TAX DISPUTES
On November 20, 2023, the Kyiv District Administrative Court considered and fully satisfied the claim prepared by us in the interests of our client to the Main Department of the State Tax Service in Kyiv and the State Tax Service of Ukraine, recognized as unlawful and canceled the decision of the Commission of the Main Department of the State Tax Service in Kyiv on the suspension of registration of tax invoices/calculations of adjustments in the Unified Register of Tax Invoices on the refusal to register our client's tax invoices and obliged the State Tax Service of Ukraine to register these tax invoices in the register of tax invoices.
CASES ON THE PROTECTION OF HONOR, DIGNITY AND BUSINESS REPUTATION
On July 17, 2023, the Suvorovsky District Court of Odessa ruled in favor of our client, recognizing as unreliable and violating the right to honor, dignity and business reputation of our client the information containing factual statements disseminated by another person and obliged this person, within three days from the moment the court decision entered into force, to refute the unreliable information disseminated by him on his personal page on the Facebook social network.
PROPERTY RIGHTS DISPUTES
The Podilskyi District Court of Kyiv considered the claim against our client for recognition of the property as joint joint ownership, recognition of ownership of part of the apartment and recognition of the apartment purchase and sale agreement as invalid, took into account our arguments and evidence and refused to satisfy the plaintiff's claim.
CRIMINAL CASES
Lawyers of AB Denys Pysany protected the interests of our client during searches of his residential premises and workplace within the framework of criminal proceedings under Part 1 of Article 114-1 and Part 3 of Article 332 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine and recorded all violations committed by law enforcement officers during the investigative actions.
CREDIT DISPUTES
We canceled the absentee decision of the Ovidiopol District Court of the Odessa region in the case of the bank's claim against our client for the collection of debt under a credit agreement.
CRIMINAL CASES
The police investigator closed the criminal proceedings on the illegal felling of trees and their subsequent alienation to unidentified persons on the territory of the Khrystynivka territorial community. We prepared a complaint against the investigator’s decision to close the criminal proceedings to the investigating judge. Following the results of the consideration, the investigating judge of the Uman City District Court of the Cherkasy region satisfied our complaint and canceled the decision of the investigator of the Uman RUP of the Main Police Department in the Cherkasy region to close the criminal proceedings.
We do not leave a reference to the decision due to the requirements of the legal aid agreement.
CASES OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENCES
Відносно нашого клієнта було складено протокол про адміністративне правопорушення згідно з яким, він, керуючи автомобілем, перед поворотом ліворуч не переконався, що це буде безпечно, не надав дорогу іншому автомобілю, який рухався на зустріч та скоїв з ним зіткнення та своїми діями порушив п.п. 10.1, 10.4 Правил дорожнього руху, за що передбачена відповідальність за ст. 124 КУпАП. Ми зібрали та надали в суд докази на захист нашого клієнта (записи з камер відеоспостереження, висновок експерта) та під час судового засідання довели, що небезпечна і аварійна дорожня ситуація була створена одноособовими діями другого учасника ДТП, який здійснив маневр, а саме обгін іншого автомобіля перед пішохідним переходом, що і стало причиною зіткнення з автомобілем нашого клієнта. Суд постановив - закрити провадження про притягнення нашого клієнта до адміністративної відповідальності за відсутністю складу адміністративного правопорушення.
LABOR DISPUTES
The Suvorovsky District Court of the city of Odessa considered the case materials on the claim of our client against the head of the Odessa Regional Military Administration, the Odessa Regional State Administration (Odessa Regional Military Administration), the Municipal Non-profit Enterprise "Odessa Regional Dermatological Dispensary" of the Odessa Regional Council and made a decision in favor of our client:
- declared illegal and canceled the Order of the Odessa Regional State Administration (Odessa Regional Military Administration) "On the dismissal of PERSON_1 from the position of General Director of the Municipal Non-profit Enterprise "Odessa Regional Dermatological Dispensary" of the Odessa Regional Council."
- renewed PERSON_1 as General Director of the Municipal Non-Profit Enterprise "Odessa Regional Dermatological and Venereological Dispensary" of the Odessa Regional Council.
- collected from the Municipal Non-Profit Enterprise "Odessa Regional Dermatological and Venereological Dispensary" of the Odessa Regional Council in favor of PERSON_1 the average earnings for the period of forced absenteeism.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DISPUTES
The Pechersky District Court of Kyiv upheld the claim and made a decision in favor of our client to declare the patent for a utility model invalid and obliged the Ukrainian National Office of Intellectual Property and Innovations to make amendments to the State Register of Patents of Ukraine for utility models regarding the declaration of the patent of Ukraine as invalid in full, and to publish this in the official bulletin "Industrial Property".
CASES CONCERNING ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENCES
We successfully represented our client in the Boguslavskyi District Court of Kyiv Region in an administrative offense case. The administrative offense report showed that our client, while driving, did not choose a safe speed, did not take into account the road surface, did not observe the distance interval, and collided with another vehicle, as a result of which the vehicles received mechanical damage and material damage was caused. At the court hearing, the defense attorney Pysanyi D.O. requested that the case be closed due to the absence of elements of an administrative offense, pointed out all the significant shortcomings contained in the accident diagram, and justified his position by the fact that it was the driver of the other vehicle who stopped abruptly without timely turning on the turns, turning on the brake lights, and turning on the hazard lights. The maneuver to avoid a collision between the two vehicles was hindered by concrete barriers on the side of the road. In addition, the damage to another car indicated in the diagram does not correspond to the damage recorded by photography. It was also noted that the case materials contain information about another participant in the accident - a car with a trailer, which was moving in front of the car with which our client collided. In our opinion, first two road trains collided with a blocking stop of the second road train with a trailer in the middle of the road and only then did our client's SUV hit it. Having studied the case materials, the court decided to close the proceedings in the case on bringing our client to administrative responsibility under Article 124 of the Code of Administrative Offenses due to the absence of elements of an administrative offense.
CRIMINAL CASES
Represented and protected the interests of the client at the stage of pre-trial investigation of a criminal offense provided for in Article 407, Part 5 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (Criminal offenses against the established procedure for military service (military criminal offenses); Unauthorized abandonment of a military unit or place of service), collected and provided evidence and data on circumstances that mitigate punishment for committing a serious crime. The court took into account the evidence provided and, taking into account that the correction and re-education of the accused is possible without isolation from society, released the accused from serving the prescribed sentence if he does not commit a new criminal offense and fulfills the duties assigned to him during the probationary period of 1 (one) year. Details of the case and links to the court decision are not published in accordance with the terms of the contract for the provision of legal services.
CRIMINAL CASES
Represented and protected the interests of the client at the stage of pre-trial investigation of a criminal offense - offering, promising or providing an improper benefit to an official, provided for in Part 1 of Article 190 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, Part 2 of Article 15, Part 4 of Article 27, Part 3 of Article 369 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, Part 1 of Article 369-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine and during the consideration of the case in the SUPREME ANTI-CORRUPTION COURT. The court approved the plea agreement concluded between the SAPO and the client. We do not post a link to the court decision in accordance with the terms of the agreement on the provision of legal services.
CRIMINAL CASES
Lawyers of AB Denys Pysany protected the interests of our client during a search of his residential premises within the framework of criminal proceedings under Part 2 of Article 364 (abuse of official position) and Part 1 of Article 366 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (official forgery) and recorded all violations committed by law enforcement officers during the investigative actions.
ECONOMIC DISPUTES
The Commercial Court of Kyiv made a decision on December 5, 2022 in favor of our client - the Interregional Office of Protective Arrays of Dnieper Reservoirs in case 910/3844/22 on the collection of debt from PJSC "Joint-Stock Company "Kyivvodokanal" for improper performance of the agreement concluded by the parties.
LAND DISPUTES
We represented the interests of the State Enterprise "Specialized (Special) Sanatorium "Primorsky" of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine in the South-Western Court of Appeal in the case regarding the seizure of land plots. The court supported our position and upheld the previous decision of the Commercial Court of Odessa Region on the seizure
ECONOMIC DISPUTES
Represented the interests of the Municipal Children's Health and Recreation Institution of the Myronivka City Council "ZORYANIY" in a case regarding debt collection under service contracts. The Commercial Court of Kyiv ruled in favor of our client.
CRIMINAL CASES
Our lawyers collected evidence, obtained the necessary court decisions to conduct a second forensic medical examination, and ordered the prosecutor to conduct an exhumation. They conducted the exhumation and proved that the cause of the person's death was murder, not suicide, in a case that was initially closed as a suicide.
We do not leave a reference to the court decision due to the restrictions provided for in the legal aid agreement.
CREDIT DISPUTES
The Shevchenkivskyi District Court of Kyiv ruled in favor of our client on the joint and several recovery of the debt under the loan agreement from the debtors in the amount of UAH 5,116,969.60 kopecks.
CREDIT DISPUTES
The bank filed a lawsuit to collect the debt under a loan agreement for which our client was a guarantor. We represented our client's interests in court and, based on the results of the case, the Sviatoshynskyi District Court of Kyiv ruled in favor of our client and dismissed the bank's lawsuit to collect the debt.
CRIMINAL CASES
Represented the interests of close relatives of the victim who died in a road accident in a criminal case regarding the driver's violation of road safety rules, which caused the victim's death. Based on the results of the case, the court passed a verdict according to which the guilty person was found guilty of committing a crime under Part 2 of Article 286 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, and sentenced him to an appropriate punishment.
ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
Our lawyers collected evidence and proved in court the absence of an event and the elements of an administrative offense in the actions of our client, the head of the Regional State Administration, whom the NACP accused of violating restrictions on concurrent employment and against whom a protocol was drawn up on the commission of an administrative offense under Part 2 of Article 172-4 of the Code of Administrative Offenses. Based on the results of the case, the court closed the proceedings.
FAMILY DISPUTES
We represented the client in a dispute arising from family relations. The man she once dated filed a lawsuit to establish the fact of living together as a family without marriage and to divide joint property. We collected evidence and defended the client's position in court. As a result of the case, the court refused to grant the plaintiff's claim against our client.
COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGES
The Court of Appeal granted our appeal, sent our client's case for compensation for material and moral damages caused by a road accident to the court of first instance for further consideration, and overturned the ruling of the judge of first instance, which returned the claim.
ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
Our lawyers collected evidence, presented the client's interests and defended the position in court in a case in which the NACP accused our client of violating restrictions on concurrent employment and combining with other types of activity, namely that he, as the head of the administration, was a member of the executive bodies of enterprises aimed at making a profit. Having examined the evidence, the judge concluded that the proceedings in the case against our client were closed due to the absence in his actions of the events and elements of administrative offenses provided for in Part 2 of Article 172-4 of the Code of Administrative Offenses.
CRIMINAL CASES
The Kyiv Court of Appeal overturned the Ruling of the Holosiivskyi District Court of Kyiv, which closed the proceedings in the case on the cancellation of the seizure of our client's property, imposed by the investigator during the investigation of a criminal case. Our client was released from criminal liability for committing a crime in connection with the application of the Law of Ukraine "On Amnesty", however, the issue of the cancellation of the seizure of property was not resolved by the court.
The Kyiv Court of Appeal sent the case back to the court of first instance for further consideration.
АДМІНІСТРАТИВНІ СПРАВИ
Our lawyers collected evidence and proved in court the absence of an event and the elements of an administrative offense in the actions of our client, the head of the Regional State Administration, whom the NACP accused of violating restrictions on concurrent employment and against whom a protocol was drawn up on the commission of an administrative offense under Part 2 of Article 172-4 of the Code of Administrative Offenses. Based on the results of the case, the court closed the proceedings.
CREDIT DISPUTES
The bank filed a lawsuit to collect the debt under a loan agreement for which our client was a guarantor. We represented our client's interests in court and, based on the results of the case, the Sviatoshynskyi District Court of Kyiv ruled in favor of our client and dismissed the bank's lawsuit to collect the debt.
COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGES
We represented our client in a case of compensation for material and moral damages caused by a road accident. The Dnipro District Court granted our claim and made a decision to recover funds from the person who was at fault in the accident in favor of our client.
СПРАВИ ПРО АДМІНІСТРАТИВНІ ПРАВОПОРУШЕННЯ
Подільський районний суд м. Києва розглянув позов до нашого клієнта про визнання майна спільною сумісною власністю, визнання права власності на частину квартири та визнання недійсним договору купівлі-продажу квартири, врахував наші аргументи та докази та відмовив позивачу у задоволенні позову.
PROPERTY RIGHTS DISPUTES
The Podilskyi District Court of Kyiv considered the claim against our client for recognition of the property as joint joint ownership, recognition of ownership of part of the apartment and recognition of the apartment purchase and sale agreement as invalid, took into account our arguments and evidence and refused to satisfy the plaintiff's claim.
CASES ON ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENCES
The NACP accused our client of failing to comply with legal requirements (instructions) that he, as the head of the commission for the termination of the district state administration, in violation of the norms of Part 8, Article 12 of the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption", did not provide information, documents within the time limits established by the Law for providing the information requested by the National Agency, which was required by the request of the National Agency. Our lawyers collected evidence, presented the client's interests in court and proved the absence of an event and an administrative offense in his actions.
The court closed the proceedings on the administrative case against our client under Part 1 of Article 188-46 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses due to the absence of an event and elements of an administrative offense in his actions.
CASES ON ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENCES
We successfully presented our client's position in the court of appeal in a traffic accident case. The court of appeal, based on the results of the case, upheld the decision of the court of first instance, which found another driver guilty of colliding with our client's car, and dismissed the appeal of the other party, who disagreed with the decision of the court of first instance and requested to send the materials of the proceedings to the Patrol Police Department to resolve the issue of bringing our client to administrative liability.
ЗЕМЕЛЬНІ СПОРИ
Our lawyers represented the interests of the Executive Committee of the Khrystynivka City Council in the Commercial Court in a case regarding the early termination of the lease agreement for a land plot of a water fund and the return of the leased property. As a result, a settlement agreement was signed with the other party and a date for the early termination of the agreement and the return of the land plot to the Khrystynivka City Council was set.
CASES OF ADMINISTRATIVE VIOLATIONS
Our lawyers proved in court that the report drawn up against our client in the case of an administrative offense under Part 1 of Article 130 of the Code of Administrative Offenses is inadmissible evidence of the latter's guilt, as it was drawn up on the basis of the results of a breathalyzer test performed using an unregistered medical device. The court closed the proceedings in the case of an administrative offense against our client under Part 1 of Article 130 of the Code of Administrative Offenses due to the absence of elements of an administrative offense in his actions.
CASES ON THE PROTECTION OF HONOR, DIGNITY AND BUSINESS REPUTATION
Захистили в Київському апеляційному суді права нашого клієнта експерта з енергетичних питань у справі про захист честі, гідності та ділової репутації.
Друга сторона намагалася скасувати рішення Голосіївського районного суду м. Києва 02 квітня 2021 року, яким було відмовлено в задоволенні їх позовних вимог до нашого клієнта та їх позов про спростування недостовірної інформації було залишено без задоволення.
CRIMINAL CASES
Represented the interests of the Khrystynivka City Council in the case of illegal seizure of land plots from municipal property
As a result of the work of our lawyers, the entries in the State Land Cadastre regarding land plots that were illegally withdrawn from the communal property of the Khrystynivka City Council were canceled, and the land plots were returned to communal property.
CRIMINAL CASES
Lawyers for AB Denys Pysany protected the interests of our client during a search of his office by investigators of the Main Investigation Department of the National Police of Ukraine within the framework of criminal proceedings under Part 4 of Article 190 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine
LABOR DISPUTES
The Solomyanskyi District Court of Kyiv satisfied our client's claim against the private educational institution where she worked, and decided to collect the salary arrears in her favor.
CRIMINAL CASES
We successfully represented our client's interests in the Holosiivskyi District Court of Kyiv in civil case 752/24547/19. The court ruled in favor of our client and lifted the seizure of his real estate, which was imposed by the investigator's decision within the framework of criminal proceedings.
CRIMINAL CASES
Слідчий не прийняв рішення про злочин, вчинений проти нашого клієнта, рішенням суду зобов`язали управління поліції Головного управління Національної поліції в м. Києві внести до Єдиного реєстру досудових розслідувань відомості про кримінальне правопоруше ння на підставі заяви про злочин проти нашого клієнта
CRIMINAL CASES
Represented the interests of the accused in a case of committing an offense under Part 2 of Article 286 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which caused the death of the victim. Collected evidence and proved in court that the accused was not in a state of alcoholic intoxication at the time of the accident.
We do not leave a reference to the court decision due to the terms of the legal aid agreement.
CREDIT DISPUTES
The Shevchenkivskyi District Court of Kyiv ruled in favor of our client on the joint and several recovery of debts from debtors under loan agreements.
TAX DISPUTES
Верховний Суд відмовив ГУ ДПС у м. Києві у відкритті касаційного провадження за касаційною скаргою на постанову Шостого апеляційного адміністративного суду в частині задоволення позову у справі за позовом нашого клієнта до Головного управління ДПС у м. Києві про визнання протиправними та скасування податкових повідомлень-рішень.
CRIMINAL CASES
And the deputies of AB Denys Pysany protected the interests of the State Enterprise of the Ministry of Defense "Kyiv Mechanical Plant" during a search by the investigative department of the Solomyansky UPGUNP in Kyiv together with the Department of Military Intelligence of the Security Service of Ukraine within the framework of criminal proceedings under Part 3 of Article 191 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine
TAX DISPUTES
We defended the client's interests in the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal in a dispute regarding the suspension of registration of tax invoices for a total amount of more than UAH 500,000 and obliged the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine to register the client's tax invoices.
TAX DISPUTES
Lawyers of AB Denys Pysany successfully defended the client's interests in the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal in a dispute with the tax authority regarding tax administration and declared unlawful and canceled the tax notice-decision in the amount of over UAH 600,000, which was issued on the basis of the enterprise inspection report.
CASES ON THE PROTECTION OF HONOR, DIGNITY AND BUSINESS REPUTATION
We defended the rights of our client, an energy expert, in court in a case of protection of honor, dignity and business reputation. We collected all the necessary evidence, prepared the necessary procedural documents and defended our client's position in court. The court refused to satisfy the claims against our client and their claim for refutation of inaccurate information was dismissed.
CREDIT DISPUTES
The notary's writ of execution was canceled in the Shevchenkivskyi District Court and the client was returned the funds previously collected by the financial company
TAX DISPUTES
Наша команда захистила інтереси клієнта в спорі з податковим органом. Окружний адміністративний суд м. Києва визнав протиправними та скасував рішення комісії Державної фіскальної служби України про відмову в реєстрації податкових накладних в Єдиному реєстрі податкових накладних та зобов`язав ДФС України зареєструвати податкові накладні в Єдиному реєстрі податкових накладних.
ROAD AND TRANSPORT EVENTS
We defended the interests of our client, whose car was damaged in a traffic accident. Our lawyers renewed the appeal deadline and overturned the court's decision in the appellate instance. As a result, the district court examined the case materials, heard all participants in the traffic accident, viewed the video from the scene of the traffic accident, and made a decision according to which the driver was found guilty of the traffic accident in which our client's car was involved.
CRIMINAL CASES
On December 18, 2020, our lawyers represented and protected the interests of the State Enterprise "Ukrainian Pharmaceutical Quality Institute" and the State Service of Ukraine for Medicines and Drug Control during searches conducted by the Main Department for Counterintelligence Protection of State Interests in the Sphere of Economic Security of the Security Service of Ukraine together with the Kyiv Local Prosecutor's Office No. 4 within the framework of criminal proceedings under Part 2 of Article 364.
Lawyers recorded all violations committed by law enforcement agencies during investigative actions
CRIMINAL CASES
The Darnytskyi District Court of Kyiv issued a verdict according to which the accused was found guilty of committing a crime - intentional infliction of moderate bodily harm to our client. The law firm provided representation and legal protection of the client's interests at the stage of pre-trial investigation and at the stage of trial.
CREDIT DISPUTES
The Holosiivskyi District Court of Kyiv refused to satisfy the claim of a financial institution against our client for foreclosure on the collateral (the plaintiff asked the court to foreclose on the collateral in order to repay the debt under the credit agreement: a car owned by our client).
LABOR DISPUTES
Одеський окружний адміністративний суд, розглянувши адміністративну справу, задовольнив позов нашого клієнта до Державної служби морського та річкового транспорту України. Рішенням суду було визнано протиправним та скасовано наказ про звільнення нашого клієнта, поновлено його на посаді та стягнено з Державної служби морського та річкового транспорту України середньомісячну заробітну плату за час вимушеного прогулу.
PUBLIC SERVICE DISPUTES
The District Administrative Court of Kyiv denied the Plaintiff's full claim to the administrative claim against the Commission on the Higher Civil Service Corps and against our client, who was determined as the winner of the competition for the vacant position of Head of the State Service of Ukraine for Medicines and Drug Control.
The Bureau's lawyers submitted to the court an objection to the lawsuit and all necessary evidence to defend our client.
Following the results of the consideration, the court refused to satisfy the Plaintiff's administrative claim.
TAX DISPUTES
The Kyiv District Administrative Court upheld the administrative claim and declared the decision of the Commission of the Main Department of the State Fiscal Service in Kyiv region to refuse to register the tax invoice in the Unified Register of Tax Invoices unlawful and overturned;
obliged the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine to register the tax invoice in the Unified Register of Tax Invoices, on the date of its actual receipt.
КРИМІНАЛЬНІ СПРАВИ
Our client applied to the Holosiivskyi Police Department of the Main Directorate of the National Police in Kyiv about the commission of a criminal offense, but this statement was not entered into the Unified Register of Pre-Trial Investigations. We received a court decision, which obliged the Holosiivskyi Police Department of the Main Directorate of the National Police in Kyiv to enter information about the criminal offense into the Unified Register of Pre-Trial Investigations based on the statement of a crime against our client
ECONOMIC DISPUTES
The Commercial Court of Kyiv made a decision on November 10, 2022 in favor of our client - the Interregional Office of Protective Arrays of Dnieper Reservoirs in case 910/6469/22 on the collection of debt from PJSC "Joint-Stock Company "Kyivvodokanal" for improper performance of the agreement concluded by the parties.